| I'll admit it – I've become obsessed with Paul Thomas Anderson's There Will Be Blood, easily the best film of the year. It's been burning inside my brain for weeks now, and I've spent countless hours dissecting Anderson's stylistic, thematic and directorial nuances, for I believe this to be that rarest of things – a perfect film. There isn't a wrong note, or single unnecessary moment, shot, or line of dialogue throughout. I've made several attempts at writing a proper review of the film, but just couldn't come up with anything sufficiently cohesive (or coherent, for that matter.) Though I've seen the film twice already, and have had some wonderful discussions with several other fans of the film, there are a handful of disparate threads regarding influences, allusions and allegories that I've not been able to tie-up.
Rather than remain silent, I've decided to post some of these miscellaneous thoughts in the hopes of encouraging discussion. What follows are notes I've jotted down at various moments, thoughts that occurred to me while in the shower, or connections I thought of on the subway. I'd love to hear your thoughts and comments, even if it is to tell me I'm completely insane about any of this. I'm treating this as a work in progress, and I may add or remove sections over the next few days.
[Note: Spoilers follow!]
BUSH / POLITICAL ALLEGORY One question that's been nagging me is whether or not Anderson is consciously engaging in a bit of political allegory. With a film about an oil tycoon set at the intersection of industry and religion ("When ambition meets faith" is the film's official tagline), it's hard not to think of both Bush 41 and 43. Like Plainview and son H.W. (as in Herbert Walker, or mere coincidence?), the Bush father-son team also made their millions in the oil industry, and control of the precious liquid has resulted in actions that mirror Plainview's, but on a much larger, global scale.
What almost convinces me of a political agenda is Anderson's inclusion of There is Power in the Blood, the Protestant hymn which George W. Bush stealthily quoted in his 2003 State of the Union Address, a wink and a nod to his fundamentalist base. Bush's line, "there's power, wonder-working power, in the goodness and idealism and faith of the American people" is an unquestionable twist on the hymn's repeated refrain, "There is power, power, wonder-working power/In the precious blood of the lamb."
At the same time, however, There Will Be Blood speaks of the triumph of business over religion, which is certainly contradictory to the current state of affairs in Bush's America, where the two have become increasingly intertwined. When Plainview first speaks to the people of Little Boston, he employs standard political rhetoric ("the children are the future") and then unsurprisingly fails to follow through on his promises. After successfully obtaining the land from the pious Sunday (natch) family and cheating them out of a fortune, Plainview becomes something of an authority figure over the community, having power such that he can put an end to the beatings that patriarch Abel Sunday inflicts on his youngest daughter Mary for not praying enough – the first of his triumphs over faith, which will continue for years until he announces "I'm finished" after snuffing out the final vestige.
But what are we to make of this ultimate triumph, nearly twenty years in the making? Anderson doesn't play favorites – there's equal corruption on both sides, and neither Daniel nor Eli are particularly worthy of our sympathy. Daniel's contempt for Eli's church is palpable, but he'll play the game, which includes public humiliation, in order to achieve his goals. Eli will in turn do the same thing. Is the final confrontation simply one man versus another, or do they represent something greater? Eli is a charlatan, and a self-confessed sinner. Is Daniel's destruction of the false prophet merely fulfillment of biblical prophecy? And where's the political allegory in this? (Sigh.)
KUBRICK Anderson has always worn his influences on his sleeve, and just as Boogie Nights owes a debt to Scorsese, and Magnolia to Altman, I'm convinced that There Will Be Blood is his ode to Kubrick, and in particular 2001: A Space Odyssey (and to a lesser extent, The Shining). Thematically the two films couldn't be more different, yet there are Kubrickian elements throughout. Let's begin with the simple.
MUSIC There are traces of Penderecki and Ligeti (two composers whose work can be found in several Kubrick films) in Jonny Greenwood's magnificent score. Compare Ligeti's pre-credit opening sequence from 2001 with Greenwood's track, Henry Plainview.
Ligeti - Overture-Atmospheres Jonny Greenwood - Henry Plainview
STRUCTURE Like 2001, TWBB is broken up into distinct, inter-titled sections which indicate leaps in time. Both films open with lengthy sequences that play out without a single line of dialog – 2001's The Dawn of Man, TWBB's 1898 – and both end with a discovery that results in advancement. The mysterious monolith in 2001 leads the apes the discovery of tools (which will ultimately lead man to space), while Daniel Plainview's accidental discovery of oil advances him from battered creature in a hole to successful oilman. (Yet as we later learn, a suit and wads of cash makes him no less a monster.)
TONE/THEME Like many of Kubrick's later films, TWBB is filled with a sense of imminent dread, and fear. It's an extremely tense film, yet a slow burn, like The Shining. Societal alienation, a staple in Kubrick's work, is also at the forefront here. SHOTS (Unfortunately, I don't have a screener of TWBB, so I can't properly illustrate as I'd like.) The final sequence in TWBB is the only one not set on the plains, in a wooden shack, or in a hole in the ground, and the difference is as severe as the post-Jupiter scenes in 2001. There are two establishing shots of Plainview's mansion: |